Defenders Of Civil And Human Rights

Supporting The Protection Of Civil And Human Rights In Australia

Human Rights Commission Australia

The Alfaro family has even experience violations of Civil and Human Rights and the corruption that exist in Offices like the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia which is being controlled by Federal Attorney General Philip RUDDOCK and Prime Minister John HOWARD.

On 13 June 2006 a formal complaint of violations of Civil and Human Rights was made in writting to the HREOC which contained full details in 106 pages and also copies of documents were provided to support the complaints which were taken personally to the Office of the HREOC in Sydney which is located at Level 8 Piccadily Towers 133 Castlereagh Street Sydney.

The Complaints to the HREOC at Page 2 Commence with the Facts To the Complaints Of Civil and Human Rights and at Paragraph 2 stated as follows:

The Violations of Civil and Human Rights are in relation to Unlawful, Malicious and Corrupted actions of Servants and Agents of the Commonwealth of Australia which seek to destroy the Civil Rights of Mr and Mrs Alfaro with the Corrupted and Malicious intention to Prevent Mr and Mrs Alfaro from presenting Evidence in the High Court of Australia which relates to a Fraudulent Bankruptcy Notice issued by the Official Receiver for NSW on 31 August 1998 and based on a Fraudulent Judgment from the Local Court at Downing Centre in Sydney and by a Fraudulent Creditor's Petition presented by Lawyer Jphn Paul Meehan with the intention to Cover Up and Conceal the Conversion of a Property registered in the named of Mrs Alfaro and for which Lawyer John Paul Meehan is responsible for the preparation of a Fraudulent Transfer Documents, Forgery of Mrs Alfaro's Signature and for the Conversion of the Property and Damages to a Security Business being operated by Mr and Mrs Alfaro until 1999."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 3 stated:

"On 22 December 2005 Mr and Mrs Alfaro attended the Sydney Office of the Registry of the High Court of Australia and attempted to file an Application to Show Cause and Affidavits which related to Ultra Vires actions of the Chief Execurive and Principal and Deputy Registrars of the High Court of Australia who are Servants or Agents of the Commonwealth of Australia which since 29 January 2003 have been engaged in activity and actions aimed at the destruction of the Civil and Human Rights of Mr and Mrs Alfaro."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 4 stated:

"In direct Violations of Articles 5.1, Article 9.5 Article 10, Article 11, Article 14 Article 16 and Article 26 of the Internation Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Deputy Registrar Mathew GREY and Deborah CARLSUND of the Sydney Office of the Registry on 22 December 2005 refused to file the Application to Show Cause and Affidavits which relate to the Untra Vires actions of the Chief Executive and Principal and Deputy Registrars of the High Court of Australia which without Jurisdiction or Powers have been preventing Mr and Mrs Alfaro from filing documents in the High Court of Australia.The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 5 stated:

"Since 11 June 2002 Mr and Mrs Alfaro had been conducting Proceedings in the High Court of Australia File No. S205 of 2002 Alfaro v Nash, Meehan and Ors which are related to a Fraudulent Bankruptcy obtained by a Fraudulent Bankruptcy Notice issued by the Official Receiver for New South Wales and by a Fraudulent Creditor's Petition presented by Lawyer John Meehan whom is responsible for the Fraudulent Conversion of a Property owned and Registered in the name of Mrs Alfaro and for which Lawyer John Meehan had Forged the Signature of Mrs Alfaro in Transfer Documents prepared by John Meehan Without authority or knowledge or consent from Mr and Mrs Alfaro."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 9 stated:

"The Principal and Deputy Registrar of the High of Australia has been acting ultra vires and in direct Violations of Article 5.1, Article 9.5, Article 10, Article 11, Article 14, Article 16 and Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights because the Principal or Deputy Registrars do not have powers under the High Court of Australia Act or under the Australian Constitution to make judicial decisions in relation to the Proceedings before the High Court of Australia. Chapter III of the of the Australian Constitution states: 71 Judicial Powers and Courts

The judicial powers of the Coomonwealth shall be vested in a Federal Supreme Court to be called the High Court of Australia and in such other federal courts as the Parliament creates, and in such other courts as it is invested with federal jurisdiction. The High Court shall consist of a Chief Judge and so many other Justices, not less than two as the Parliamnet prescribes."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 10 stated:

"The Chief Executive and Principal and Deputy Registrars are Violating Article 5, Article 14, Article 16 and Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by engaging in actions and activity aimed at the destruction [of] the Civil Rights of Mr and Mrs Alfaro by forcing Mr and Mrs Alfaro to obtain:

(a) consent from the Official Trustee which is the ITSA (Insolvency Trustee Services Australia) and which is the Officlal Receiver in Bankruptcy for New South Wales and a Defendant in the High Court Proceedings and also Part of the Office of the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Australia.

(b) the Official Receiver in Bankruptcy for New South Wales issued the Fraudulent Bankruptcy Notice with the intention to cause damages to Mr and Mrs Alfaro and assist Lawyer John Meehan in a Cover Up and Concealment of the Fraudulent Conversion of a Property and Forgery of the signature of Mrs Alfaro in Transfer Documents prepared by Lawyer John Meehan Without the authority, consent, or knowledge of Mr and Mrs Alfaro.

(c) the Official Receiver in Bankruptcy for New South Wales has engaged in preparing Fraudulent Documents and making false allegations against Mr and Mrs Alfaro."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 22 stated:

"The Chief Executive and Principal and Deputy Registrar of the High Court have since 29 January 2003 been Violating Article 5.1, Article 9.5, Article 10, Article 11, Article 14, Article 16 and Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights because they know that on 10 June 2003 the matters relating to the Bankruptcy Documents were before Justice William GUMMOW of the High Court of Australia."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 24 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Justice GUMMOW at Page 10 about Paragraph 305 stated:

"The case is not being stopped".

A Copy of the Transcript of 10 June 2003 can be seen at Court Documents

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 25 stated:

The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Justice GOMMOW at Page 5 at about Paragraph 85 stated:

"Now if you are not happy about what is going in the application book Order 69A rule 10(10) says that you can, as it were, prepare your own supplementary book, I am sure the Registrar has told you that."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 26 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Mr Alfaro at Page 6 from Paragraph 95 to 135 put the case to Justice GUMMOW that Mr and Mrs Alfaro would not be able to refer to documents that were not listed in the Application Book."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 27 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 also demonstrates that Mr Alfaro as Page 7 about Paragraph 140 stated:

"Your honour, what you are trying to do is to assist the respondents to conceal documents in relation to a bankruptcy that is fraudulent, that is illegal, and you cannot make legal an illegal action."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 29 stated:

"The Trancript of 10 June 2003 dmonstrate that Justice GUMMOW at Page 7 at about Paragraph 165 stated:

"You already go some leave from the New South Wales Court of Appeal, did you not."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 30 stated:

"The Transcropt of 10 June 2003 demonstrates that Mr Alfaro at Page 7 at about Paragraph 170 stated:

"Well, we are not going to pursue that because what they are trying to do is to stop us from presenting a claim against the respondents, against all the respondents. There are some damages in relation to a business, in realtion to a bankruptcy that it is as I said before ----- (illegal)

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 31 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrates that Justice GUMMOW at Page 7 at about Paragrap 170 stated:

"I realise that, but all I am saying to you is that you got some leave from the New South Wales Court of Appeal. You do not want that. You do not want to keep that."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 32 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Mr Alfaro at Page 7 at about Paragraph 175 stated:

"No I am not going to do that."The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 33 stated:

"The Transcript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Mr Alfaro at Page 7 at about Paragraph 180 stated:

"I put to you that I filed my application for special leave whitin the 28 days, so it is our decision to requeest special appeal to the High Court."

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 34 stated:

"The Tranacript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Mr Alfaro at Page 8 at about Paragraph 185 stated:

"So, I put to you, your Honour that the application book reference as it is at the moment will not let us present a proper case---"

The Complaints to the HREOC at Paragraph 39 stated:

"The TRanscript of 10 June 2003 demonstrate that Justice GUMMOW at Page 11 at about Paragraph 325 stated:

"Every well, I dismiss the motion filed on 6 May 2003 and costs of that motion will be costs of the special leave application. Although the motion technically was incompetent in that it attempted to make it returnable before the Full Court, nevertheless in arguments I have endevoured to get to the substance of the matter under the Rules, which is the existence of Order 69A rule 10(10) involving the preparation of supplementary book. The Court will now adjourn"

The Complaint to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia contained full details including full details of a Judgements made by former Justice of the Court of Appeal and Commissioner Terence COLE whom in November 1998 had made a Judgment and Orders against the Afaros to cover up and conceal the conversion of real property and fraudulent transfer documents and the forgery of signature by Lawyer John Meehan who is responsible for the conversion of the real property.

The corrupted Judgment of former Judge and Commissioner Terence COLE was also made with the malicious intention to cover up and conceal the corrupted Judgment of former Acting Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and now Federal Court Judge Peter GRAHAM, whom on 1 September 1997 had made a corrupted Judgment and orders to cover and conceal the conversion of the real property and fraudulent transfer documents and forgery of the signature by Lawyer John Meehan. The Judgement of Terence COLE can be seen at Court of Appeal Documents

The Complaints to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia also included Full Details in relation to a Judgment and Orders made by Justice KATZ of the Federal Court Australia on 25 June 1999 in relation to the Fraudulent Bankruptcy Notice and Fraudulent Creditors Petition and Sequestration Orders made to Conceal the conversion of a property and damages and criminal activity by Lawyer John P. Meehan. The Judgment of Justice KATZ can be seen at Court Documents

On 27 November 2006 Karen TOOHEY Delegate of the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia wrote to the Alfaros and part of her correspondence stated as follows:

"I refer to your complaints against the High Court of Australia, lodged pursuant to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (the HREOC Act), alleging a breach of your human rights."

"As I undertand it, your complaint to the commission focuses on the High Court's decision to refuse to accept your application to seek special leave to appeal without your trustee's approval. You have alleged that the Deputy Registrar's decision has impacted on your rights to appear before the High Court and to present evidence in relation to an alleged bankruptcy notice and other matters."

"Decision

After careful consideration of the information presented by you, I have decided not to inquire into your complaints persuant to section 20(2)(c)(ii) of the HREOC Act. I am of the opinion that your claim that the Deputy Registrar's decision not to accept your application was a breach of your human rights as set out in Article 5.1, 9.5, 10,11.14.16,and 26 of the ICCPR, is either misconceived or lacking in substance."

Reasons for decision

You have alleged that the High Court has breached Article 5.1

Article 5.1 states: Nothing in the present Covenant many be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a greater extend than provided for in the present covenant.

To demonstrate that there has been a breach of this Article, you must be able to desmonstrate that the High Court has engaged in an activity which is aimed at the destruction of the rights set out in the ICCPR, or that limitation imposed by the High Court go beyond those that are provided for by the ICCPR.

After examining the information before the Commission, I do not believe you have provided any information setting out how this Article applies to your circumstances or demonstrated how the High Court's decision could constitute a breach of it. Therefore, I have decided to not inquire into this aspect of your complaint pursuant to section 20(2)(c)(ii) of the HREOC Act as I am of the opinion that it is misconceived."

t is not suprising that Karen TOOHEY Delegate of the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia had decided not to make an Investigation of the Violations of Civil Rights by the Principal and Deputy Registrars of the High Court, Ms TOOHEY is a Friend of the Chief Executive and Priincipal Registrar of the High Court Mr M. DOOGAN and they have attended meetings with the Attorney General Philip RUDDOCK, many times since the HOWARD Goverment took power.

The Complaints dated 13 June 2006 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in Australia has given full details of Corrupted Actions by former Judge of the Court of Appeal of NSW and Commissioner Terence COLE who is a personal friend of Prime Minister John HOWARD and it is not suprising that the Corruption in Australia goes all the way to the HREOC which is being controlled by Federal Attorney General Philip RUDDOCK and by the Prime Minister of Australia John HOWARD.